Cheap houses in cheap areas are cheap precisely because the areas themselves are low value with a low expected-value of living there.
Put another way, those houses are cheap because employment opportunities are limited.
Put another way, those houses are cheap because employment opportunities are limited.
I do have a lot of respect for the people who are able to make a sustainable living in a less dense area, but it’s not a reliable path for everybody.
Certainly nothing in the comment itself even hints at me considering entire communities of people as worthless.
Uhhh... Maybe consider giving away your laptop, and go live innawoods in a loincloth.
If you use "capitalist" dispargingly, while benefitting from it, I'd describe you as a hypocrite, naive, and immature.
If you're not a capitalist, stop accepting benefits created by capitalism.
Go find a deer, harvest its skin to clothe yourself, and drink from the local creek. ...or, continue being a comfy capitalist.
From what I discern, you've chosen the latter.