I’ve seen these giveaway scams on hacked popular Twitter accounts for years, I’m surprised they’re still so effective. No need for an attacker to risk making $0 on a more involved attack when they can get easy cash like that, I guess.
I’ve seen these giveaway scams on hacked popular Twitter accounts for years, I’m surprised they’re still so effective. No need for an attacker to risk making $0 on a more involved attack when they can get easy cash like that, I guess.
If you plug SIM card into desktop, you can actually do signing with it, and TLS authentication.
I recall, only Nokia S60 series, and A200 had a SIM card API exposed to apps. Ios does not give you access to SIM, Android does only for system apps.
I doubt that: simply add two "SIM identities" (which on the mobile phone map to the same SIM card) to the account of the respective service.
Before you all warn me i know it is the worst possible brand to own, i am getting spied on by all the regulars that come with Android - Google/ US agencies but i also get the added bonus of China spying on the device. But i was broke.
The fact that some person is trustworthy by his personality traits does not imply that he does have the (also technological) skills not to become scammed or impersonated.
Easy money seems to be a pretty common goal.
https://fortune.com/2020/07/16/hackers-blew-twitter-god-mode...
It’s much of what Elon, Trump and other populists actively foster and exploit in their fan base through relentless conspiracy theories and undermining of trust into anyone who isn’t them.
There’s a paradox here - the more people have their trust violated, the more distrustful they get, the easier they get scam as the overhead of approaching every transaction / interact in life with an adversarial mindset exhausts critical capacity and drives people into desperate savior fantasies - technological miracles, charlatans. snakeoil, the twentieths coin or pump and dump.
Zero trust (non security version - the inability to extend trust) is a miserable desperate state to be in as a human being and makes people highly vulnerable to getting taken advantage of and crypto signaling on social media either identifies you as a scammer or as a mark. You still believe technology can solve societies trust dilemma, you are asking for it at this point.
And the longer the scamming goes on, the stronger the signal of this self identifying audience becomes. It’s like responding to Nigerian prince emails at this point.
Go reddit, look at the safemoon subreddit. It’s … wild how many times you can rip off some people and have them get more militant in their belief they are smart.
As a footnote, more and more tech companies explore this to prop up shrinking profit margins. By selling previously valuable trust marks such as the top result on google (there was a time you could trust this) or flat out verification marks that previously were meant to foster Trust and Safety for money, erosion of trust becomes a profitable feature. It’s good for platforms when users cannot tell placed / bought placement and fake news from actual valuable content.
It’s just terminal for society - each time someone is scammed, has their trust betrayed, they slide a little bit closer into that state that is so exploitable by populists.
Trusting the first website they read is exactly the defining trait of crypto bros. Normal people just use experience to guide their decision, like say, do like their parents and stick to a bank account.
Very well said.
Nice. A happy user of Reddit, the platform, whose CEO edits messages of his opponents to win an argument, that shadow bans users for mentioning specific words ("Soros" is one, BTW), that automatically sends wrong-think posts to spam... would tell us about the dystopian future Musk is leading us into. What kind of trust do you have in mind, like the one built in soviet times Pravda and Moskovskiy Komsomolets?
Speaking of Soviet Russia - the FSB has fascinating manuals on exactly this topic, how to break down people’s ability to trust systematically to make them vulnerable to ideological hijacking via authority figures and contrarian messages. Highly recommended reading.
As we say in German “getroffene Hunde bellen ”.
If one were interested in finding these to read where or how might they be found?
I’ll see if I can find the primary ones, they are from the archives after the Soviet collapse.
Secondary reading:
Adrian Chen, “The Agency,” New York Times Magazine, June 2, 2015, and Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss, The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money, New York:
https://tnsr.org/2022/09/whats-old-is-new-again-cold-war-les...
Institute of Modern Russia and The Interpreter, 2014.
https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/c...
Idols, Soros conspiracy... And you accuse others of being stupid. A simple idea, shady practices on the part of a platform are not OK if what you want, as you say, is trust.
> I have some crypto coins to sell you too.
I'm sure you have. You were left holding the bag in the subreddit you've mentioned.
> the FSB has fascinating manuals on exactly this topic. Highly recommended reading.
Right, they've sent you a copy. You and your government, the idiots who can be seen laughing [1][2] when told they should not depend on Russian energy. "I don't really understand what he means by that ha-ha-ha", tells your genius defense minister.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...