Meanwhile, a "website designer" who's never deployed a website, was never hired to create one and who suffered zero injury gets a ruling. This SCOTUS is invalid.
Where did you get the idea that she's never deployed a website? I've never heard anyone say that. (And at the very least, she has her own site, https://303creative.com/ )
> Puzzlingly, before she actually filed the first suit in 2016, Smith had apparently never designed a wedding website. Even weirder: She had never apparently been asked to provide services to a same-sex couple up to that point either.
And the customer who "requested" the site was fake, too:
> But after The New Republic reached out to Stewart directly—his contact information was readily accessible in court documents—the story fell apart: He said he had never submitted the form; he said TNR’s call was “the very first time I’ve heard of it.”
> It was later discovered by The New Republic that Smith had made a wedding website for a heterosexual couple in 2015, which had been removed from her business's profile prior to her filing the case but remained visible in the Wayback Machine archives
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jul/25/lgbtq-rights-sup...
She wasn't, so she removed references to wedding sites. Why do you find that strange?
The Democrats would have done the exact same if given the opportunity and then you’d have the Right crying about how the court is “invalid”.
To change this, we should require some kind of supermajority to confirm judicial appointments at all levels.
That was the de facto situation until 2013 (until 2017 for the Supreme Court).[1] The Republican SCOTUS majority became entrenched when Mitch McConnell refused to allow the Senate to consider Merrick Garland in early 2016, though. That wasn't luck.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option#2013:_Cloture_o...
What would the Democrats be doing if they had a supreme court majority? I don't really follow US politics that closely but I got the impression that the Democrats were mostly about not rocking the boat too much?
That's about as disingenuous as it comes.