Hey don't pin this on me it's not my assertion.
But it is your assertion, wherever you've picked up the idea from.
...which is the same as AGI..
...effectively defines AGI...
No it isn't, and no it doesn't. Your language is too strong in its claims.
But it is your assertion, wherever you've picked up the idea from.
...which is the same as AGI..
...effectively defines AGI...
No it isn't, and no it doesn't. Your language is too strong in its claims.
Where a lot of us get off the fence is when we remove "perfect" from the mix. I don't personally think that performance on a compression task correlates very strongly with what we'd generally consider as intelligence. I suspect good AGIs will function as excellent compression routines, but I don't think optimizing on compression ratio will necessarily be fruitful. And I think it's quite possible that a more powerful AGI could perform worse at compression than a weaker one, for a million reasons.