Personally I think the tyre dust thing will be another global ecological crisis. I am not saying the tyre dust issue “is” caused by electrics, it’s not, but tyre dust is a huge and hard to solve problem and tyres are toxic things.
Plastics just fall off cars too, roads themselves are ecologically bad. If you ride along the side of a highway on a bike you will see amazing amount of plastic rubbish. Even the highways are lined with plastic materials and object that disintegrate. Fencing, astroturf etc All of which ends up disintegrating and everywhere.
Each day that passes I’m happier I’ve always been and always will be an avid walker and cyclist. Yes I own a car but I use it very sparingly and thoughtfully.
Turns out, when there's demand, we're pretty good at expansion infrastructure. In an emergency it could be a great project for the market too, like the highway expansion.
Current capacity 43,777 MW
Current demand 29,361 MW
Difference 14,315 MW
That enough to charge 2.8 million cars at 5kw.If you’re going sixty miles each way, no matter how you commute (aside from maybe a bus), it’s going to be a disaster from a fuel and environment perspective regardless of drivetrain.
Californians drive 340 billion miles a year. If that were all EV's then they would consume 85 billion kwh/year.
Solar insolation is about 2000 hours a year.
So you would need 42.5 GW of solar. With say 30 million cars that would be 1500W per car.
Check, average car drives 35 miles a day. So needs 8.75 kwh. 6 hours of sunlight so you'd need 1460 watts or solar.
That's $1500 worth of solar per car.
Set and match. Totally totally doable.
In any case, the grid can improve in capacity as more electric cars are sold in the state.