> If you think of magazines, it would be a disappointment for Rolling Stone to contain no ads.
I'll bite…because they're pretty? Or because how else would one stay on top of the latest Axe body spray releases?
I'll bite…because they're pretty? Or because how else would one stay on top of the latest Axe body spray releases?
This is more acute on hard news. Where a single page article may cost 100k to produce, yet wont be able to be monetized per its "cost to produce".
So yes, it would be a disappointment to lose "great content". now, here lies in the kicker. You get to decide great content with your patronage ( or lack there of)