Hacker News Reader

And they pay a license fee to do so. Artist textbooks are not free, because they pay the rights holders to reproduce their work.

View on HN

categorically false.

What is categorically false?

that artists pay a license fee to learn from other artists work. it’s an utterly ridiculous argument.

Bullshit. You can look up all works up for free online. What a sorry argument. Copyrighted means you can’t reproduce it, not not look at it.

There’s probably an argument against my point, but this sure ain’t it. I can watch every Disney movie for free on the internet, but that doesn’t make it legal.

It's legal in Germany.

What's illegal here is unauthorized distribution. Downloading a copy of something from a public server cannot get you in trouble here. Only publishing does.

It's not and never was. In 2008 it even got raised from a civil to a criminal offense. It's a common misconception because it is more lucrative to go after people that also upload/publish due to higher possible damages.

For the most part we’re talking about static images here, atleast for the current state of LLMs and those are all freely viewable online.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com