This is the average effective tax rate: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=19545
This is the average effective tax rate: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=19545
I mean it's right there in the article, "the expiration of expansions to refundable tax credits had a particularly important impact on SPM poverty."
I'm not sure how the top ranked comments, both of them, get things so wrong.
However you are definitely onto something sophisticated so... can you comment on the substance of the article instead of this kind of arcane thing that couldn't be the biggest factor?
Start with nominal income, YoY. Personal income is before-tax, disposable personal income is after-tax
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=195kL
Nominal incomes were up 2.3% in 2022, but after tax incomes were down 0.3%. Wage inflation had pushed people into higher tax brackets, and the standard deduction covered a smaller portion. That did not get corrected until Jan 2023, when brackets and deductions all went up over 7%. So the big takeaway is that nominal wage gains in 2022 were all eaten up by higher taxes, and that’s before we layer in inflation.
Now, lets layer in inflation:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=195ll
But now let’s add in H1 2023. First, nominal
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=195mP
With the lowered effective tax rate, we see a much bigger gain in after-tax income, up 8.1% YoY in H1 2023. Now layer in inflation, much reduced from 2022:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=195mw
Things look much brighter with less inflation, and brackets/deductions that caught up with inflation
Keep in mind these data are from BEA’s monthly personal income tables. The article is from a separate Census Bureau survey, that tells largely the same story with different numbers