The irony being that it would have massively benefitted from a huge range of ML tools, be it the crusty audio or the atrocious pacing. But I mean... same deal as every day, pop-luddites squeezing their audiences for subscribers (another bout of irony because they accuse "AI" to do the same, somehow). It's still fascinating and good to see that we get some lengthy essays about this, I can't wait for us to discuss how well it's aged in one or two years or so.
Traditional ethics? Is there some modern non-traditional ethics these days as well?
Read it together, traditional copywrite ethics.
But what's the traditional part? Training models with other people's work without credit or pay is ok by some new form of ethics now? It's almost like you want to say it's unethical to do so, but want to side step the issue altogether at the same time.
The way we have traditionally thought about copywrite has not necessarily taken into account the immediacy and effortlessness of derivatives.
It’s just different now, and we don’t really understand what this is going to mean going forward.