That is a horrible font to read anything more than a headline.
The website is deeply, substantially difficult to read. It takes significant effort to read that site. It's actually startling how difficult that site is to read. It might even be worth having an entire discussion on why that site is so difficult read.
By the time I reached the end, I was left with an unsettling feeling that anyone who cares so little about whether what they wrote is legible might also not be particularly careful about whether what they wrote is true. Presentation does matter.
If that were true how would you know what it was saying in order to disagree with it?
But like your ad hominem, it’s an irrelevant point, sorry.
> Also, you might want to read up on what an ad hominem is so you can use it correctly in the future.
Oh, okay, is that what I might wanna do? Hahaha. No, you wouldn't know. I guess you're the ad hominem expert, tho, right? That's you trying to do it there?
I see you just want to fight. I'm not here for that, sorry.
Did you get upset? I suppose you couldn't take that criticism of what you were doing, so you had to try to flip it around! Hahaha, not exactly a recipe for improvement, is it? Hahaha.
The font weight is too light. It's not a body font, it's a display font. And using small-caps for body text is absurd.
I read some of it. It was too exhausting to read all of it. Not worth the effort.