If humans could live on red tape alone, the EU could feed the world.
If humans could live on red tape alone, the EU could feed the world.
How does someone even make the argument that 11% poverty in the US is exactly the same as 0.4% in Denmark?
That said, one great thing both Denmark and the US have in common is that neither country will shoot you at the border for trying to leave.
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/233910/poverty-rates-in-...
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/02/22/europe/france-student-tea...
lower tier school in germany => no higher education
School funding goes toward teaching staff, school supplies (pencils, books, desks, chalkboards, etc.), food and water, and building maintenance (bathrooms, sinks, HVAC, etc.). There are also administrative staff, cleaning staff, and counselors i.e. school psychologists. In the case of K-12 public schools, taxes are the funding. Parents with lower income pay less in taxes (in literal dollars, not percentage-wise). Poorer school districts get less funding [1]. Less funding means fewer teachers or lower salaries. One article I read points out that teacher turnover is higher in schools with less funding and that higher turnover is worse for student learning [2]. While the article suggests that the turnover is at least partially due to whether the teachers are culturally and socially prepared to teach high-poverty student populations, increased funding could go toward providing poverty-aware training, training for resolving behavioral issues, and increased salaries to incentivize retention. ("Training for resolving behavioral issues" would include carefully assessing school policies to prevent a school-to-prison pipeline [3].)
On the other hand, a poor neighborhood has many other confounding factors which can influence student success. Poorer families are less able to buy healthy nourishment, and hunger distracts students in class [4]. Money problems distract parents from developing healthy, present relationships with their children. A poor neighborhood is less able to train police officers to deal with violence in the streets while also avoiding excessive violence in response. A poor city (or an indifferent state government [5]) can't account for or replace lead pipes and lead paint, and lead exposure harms brain development.
[1] https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2018-02-27/...
[2] https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/the-socioeconomic-...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School-to-prison_pipeline
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_noise#Physiologi...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis#Hurley_Medi...
I think it might be a little more complex than that? "Living conditions in Europe - poverty and social exclusion" [0], "Poverty in Europe" [1]:
>"In 2022, 95.3 million people in the EU (22 percent of the population) were at risk of poverty or social exclusion, i.e. living in households facing at least one of the three risks of poverty and exclusion: income poverty, severe material and social deprivation and/or living in a household with very low work intensity (where adults work at less than 20 percent of their potential over one year). According to Eurostat data, this figure has remained relatively stable compared to the previous year (95.4 million in 2021, 22 percent of the population)."
I don't support total "laissez-faire capitalism" at all as I understand and think it's counter to the free market as well as bad for society, but I don't think you can just claim the opposite extreme has clearly better outcomes. It's not unreasonable to argue that both the US and EU go too far towards different ends of the spectrum.
----
0: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...
1: https://www.statista.com/chart/30411/share-of-people-at-risk...
This seems like comparing apples to oranges or am I missing something?
On a similar note, is there parity between US definitions of poverty and European definitions of poverty and/or are the statistics normalized to account for any differences?
That isn't to say that the US and Europe are the same. The US government is more captured by industry. Occasionally this is actually an advantage, because the industry can push back against the more ridiculous of the naive incompetence of people who are good at identifying problems but not solutions. The industries also use it to put up regulatory barriers to entry and promote market consolidation, which is very bad, but that happens in Europe too.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but you could pretty easily have a UBI that essentially eliminates poverty without having an incompetent regulatory apparatus that tries to micromanage every part of the economy. On either continent.