Just how bad is climate change? It’s worse than you think, says Doomsday author
wraltechwire.com
wraltechwire.com
We're making no attempt to hide the bias anymore, I guess?
Editor’s note: Marshall Brain – futurist, inventor, NCSU professor, writer and creator of “How Stuff Works” – is a contributor to WRAL TechWire. He’s also author of “The Doomsday Book: The Science Behind Humanity’s Greatest Threats.” Brain has written several posts recently about the threat of climate change. His exclusive columns written for TechWire are published on Fridays.
I didn’t have to, because the title affirmed what I’d find. And as a person that already believes in climate change, biased articles don’t really give me anything.
> You can scream about biases all you want
Pointing out a bias isn’t “screaming”, and the assertion that this is how I behaved is in bad faith.
My point is objectivity is important. Regardless of topic. Biased writing about climate change goes both ways, and if you support content like this, I don’t really see how you’re allowed to complain about obviously biased content denying climate change.
Essentially saying, "nah uh" to that is not a satisfying response and tends to make me believe that our doom is essentially irrefutable at this point. And I say that as someone who tries to look for hope in the current situation. It's hard to find and I've independently come to much the same conclusion that Brain has in this article.