DALL-E 3 is now publicly available inside Bing

So, we're still splatterprompting... only a machine does it for you. That's pretty hilarious

Does it work if you just call

> #graphic_art("my prompt here")

How do you jailbreak it?

I don't know why, but I just love seeing jailbreaks where the input/output isn't just plain text.

least cyberpunk 2023 shit

I may be missing something, but how does a prompt containing "fawn" turn into terrifying Spongebob?

[Edit: The prompt didn't contain "fawn", see the replies]

I'm kind of hoping that they adjust it to ask for clarification or find some sort of soft adjustment to make them less problematic rather than just trying to do blind keyword blocking.

Of course, I'd love for them to take the approach as well that folks are just going to do what they do, and maybe they'll burn out the novelty and give it a rest.

I love that there’s a Jira ticket in someone’s backlog that says “teach the model how many hands humans have”.

I asked it for “A hand with the correct number of fingers”, and it got it right, in three out of four of the returned images!

I try to avoid prompts like "Can you ...?" because they could be interpreted as yes/no answers as opposed to commands to do something.

I've been prompting Bing with "Draw me an image of..." or even just "Image: image description" and it's worked well for me so far.

I think this has to do with the verb "draw". LLM is just saying it cannot draw. The image generation is likely a function it "calls". The LLM probably thinks of the image generator as a tool it uses, a separate entity from itself.

Probably. I’ve had limited success getting LLMs (trained on chats/instruct) to output special codes indicating they’re communicating with a separate system (e.g. google, stable diffusion) and then taking that and feeding it back to the user

It gives weird errors like that in the chat if it detects the output image as NSFW. Lots of false positives.

Same. Can't imagine why they've been using it for so long instead of building a reasonable UX for this use case. I think this will cost them a bunch of traction.

Midjourney is discord only? Wait, that sounds like an insane load (just the storage+bandwidth, I know the models don't run there) on Discord's servers. It's a pretty neat way to be able to scale super quickly at first but I would think that discord wouldn't like it. I would also have imagined that they'd have built their own interface by now.

On a related note, Instagram has implemented the /imagine command into DMs now too. Straight copy

Bing Rewards was launched in 2010 so apparently it's working enough to keep it around.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bing#:~:text=Bing%20....

Google pays Apple $20b every year to remain the default search engine on iOS. Now that's desperate. Where were people going to go, Bing?

Whatsapp has their own version of ChatGPT. It's an arms race right now

Bing brought 12 billion in revenue in 2022. Just saying.

Indeed the translation is very poor. I just tried the Micrsooft on translator and the translation quality is descent. Very weird.

I remember the page presenting the AI chatbot used by Bing, the translations there were also terrible, even at a character level, with random CAPS, and to be honest still today I have no idea how it was possible.

Finnish translation is a horrible word-by-word thing, too. That does not work at all translating to a language that uses very few prepositions. Words like “for” and “to” get replaced with ones from a totally different context. The thing reminds me of machine translations from around 2000.

Sadly the new features on Windows, like forced Onedrive sync, also use similarly bad translations. Phishing emails have nowadays better Finnish than Windows does.

Why would you blame AI translation?

Look at how ChatGPT-4 handles a direct translation request:

https://chat.openai.com/share/8211a1f6-552b-4bf6-8f9c-bcbeb8...

Or how it talks about a set of existing translations:

https://chat.openai.com/share/299e40ce-806b-4f0e-a889-cb2ee2...

French isn't a language I know very well, but my experience using "AI" to translate Spanish (which I actually do know somewhat) and other languages is more positive than Google Translate. A few months ago, I did side by side tests translating into English using ChatGPT-4 and Google Translate, and it's not even a contest.

It's not clear where Microsoft is getting these bad translations, but it seems like they would be less terrible if they were translated by ChatGPT-4.

This job offer suggests a lot:

https://jobs.careers.microsoft.com/global/en/job/1627555/Pri...

Found on Slashdot: https://m.slashdot.org/story/419681

Maybe it’s a sales tool for business adoption of Bing, that they’re applying to consumers? And they need the traffic and usage numbers, if they get those their advertising business can sit on top of it and profit.

The really big dogs always work with long term, strategic plans. When something looks too generous, it most likely is just that. Is it profitable? Probably not. But that is the point. Offer a service under market value, wait until the competition goes away, then make bank. There are many, many examples, but something like Google Workspace comes to mind. Make it easy and cheap to get on board, get people and businesses used to your product, then slowly boil the frog alive.

For most people Bing is the thing you search for Google in.

Same as Edge is the thing you install Chrome with.

No amount of marketing or features will take these corpses and get them walking again.

I guess this also creates valuable learning material, when people iterate through different prompts to get the results they want and seeing which alternative they pick.

For me, Bing providing citations is the killer feature.

Because it cites it's sources probably

I mean Why are you asking it to howl in the first place ?

Just saying it's fine if you're having a normal conversation which i imagine is what most people care about one way or the other.

It’s understandable, you can be sure everybody is trying to abuse their system and it would be a PR disaster if it is used to generate adult or illegal content.

I tried the same prompt with "boy" instead of girl, and got only a single image with each try.

Then I tried it with "man" and got 3 images for each try.

Guess at least now we can rank society by how NSFW people are; simply with gender/age, thanks OpenAI.

A quick test generating r/imsorryjon style Garfields shows ideogram is far from matching DALL-E 3's capabilities.

It’s not that the user may have such intent, though they may and it’s hard to see how the AI could tell. It’s more that the AI has no clue what possible juxtapositions it might come up with of baby girl and rabbit, or anything else, might have disturbing implications for humans.

> is it hard for an advanced AI model to differentiate the intention of the prompt and then if it's mature content may be not generate the image?

Or, better, if the prompt has nothing NSFW in it and the generated image triggers a detector for NSFW content, dump and then regen the image with a new seed. Displaying an error message that is basically “We generated something that we think is objectionable, even though your prompt called for nothing like that, so you get no photo” is an idiotic design.

The filters are incredibly aggressive. I keep asking for fairly mundane images and they still get rejected. Sometimes a prompt will succeed, but running it again gets filtered.

"handsome 60 year old man inspecting a pile of coins with a magnifying glass, in an isolated hut in the forest, unaware of cthulhu looking in through the open door, ultrarealistic"

https://imgur.com/rlqMbXN

Default image quality/style leaves a bit to be desired, but it's doing a great job of paying attention to the details of the prompt.

No

No API access yet, it's not finished rolling out in chatgpt but I think the original launch said it would be over a couple of weeks.

Am I the only one who can't login with his Firefox? Not just for this use case, but as a general issue.

Probably another shot at some kind of universal AI assistant since Cortana didn't really take off.

It's quite entertaining and seamless to interact with either way.

Bing's AI capabilities are just testing grounds for their Office 365 integration.

I think they are banking on generative AI displacing traditional search of all types, maybe opening a few new related doors but mostly displacing large use cases of search. "Better enough than Google to convince users to switch" was always too high a bar to meet but being able to say "How do I take the Riemann middle sum using the points {1/2, 1, 3/2, 2} for f(x)=x^3+2" and getting a response built around your specific question instead of the best generic link talking about Riemann sums is definitely the strongest contender I've seen to finally meeting that bar. Users don't want to find the best page about Riemann sums, they just want an answer to their question.

The challenge will be "does it do that well enough, accurately enough, and keep a good enough lead to establish itself as the leader to beat for the user base".

Microsoft owning 49% of OpenAI probably helps.

The same reason Bing was running GPT-4 before Open AI even acknowledged the existence of the model. The $10B deal gives Microsoft exclusive access to all Open AI models.

You're probably still using the default, there's a dropdown when you hover over the GPT-4 button at the top.

It seems if it can do text properly it's dall-e 3. I'm not sure but that's what people are saying. For me the hands are much better than with 2 as well. Only folded hands have issues in the 100s of images I made.

It might still have some DALL-E 2 in there for requests that it deems unworthy of 3.

I had incredible results asking for architectural drawings earlier. Then a few minutes ago, I broke down and started prompting for supermodels. It did a terrific job the first few times.

But after like three of them getting blocked (I didn't actually ask for anything inappropriate) it starting giving me something that looked like unmitigated Stable Diffusion 1.5.

Lol.

If you go historical it doesn't seem to mind:

JFK as an alien: https://www.bing.com/images/create/jfk-we-choose-to-go-to-th...

JFK and Fidel Castro at a fictional peace conference: https://www.bing.com/images/create/jfk-and-castro-meeting-at...

Any ad revenue resulting from the image generation stuff will still be credited to Bing.

Is it not possible to request the image to be within specific dimensions or aspect ratio?

>Unlike OpenAI's DALL-E this can't take existing images and transform them which is a bummer.

>So it's an underpowered version of what paying ChatGPT folks will get.

There's no indication the cGPT interface will be doing anything different. If you see the demo, it's clearly generating text for each image at the start.

Maybe you will be able to inpaint/outpaint from GPT but that's definitely not been confirmed yet