Case in point is "doing business with American/Russian companies" not the evils of war, which are undisputable.
The "freedom" is a very important point when doing any kind of risk assessment of a vendor deal.
> You realize that they did offer to extradite bin Ladin, right?
I did not, thanks for the info.
Also, just to provide a source and details on the extradition offer, they offered to extradite him to a third country for trial which I think is more than reasonable, but the US said that there was no need for proof or process.
>"There's no need to discuss it," Bush said. "We know he's guilty. Just turn him over. … There's nothing to negotiate about. They're harboring a terrorist and they need to turn him over."
So essentially the US and the rest of the world razed a country to the ground because they wanted a man so badly that when the country offered to give that man a fair trial before a third neutral country, the US found that offensive and destroyed them? democracy much?
But to hear that the Talibans were the reasonable or at least negotiating party here is insane.