The solution isn't to randomly start blaming CEOs for things they had no realistic control over, it's to swing in the other direction of putting more money towards workers by taking it away from pure growth-oriented goals.
The solution isn't to randomly start blaming CEOs for things they had no realistic control over, it's to swing in the other direction of putting more money towards workers by taking it away from pure growth-oriented goals.
My perception is that it’s really really hard to differentiate between someone who’s genuinely a force to be reckoned with and someone who’s just in the right place at the right time. After their first success they can hop around between companies from executive role to executive role playing it safe and riding the gravy train just by not fucking it up. I’d be interested if anyone can provide examples of executives that consistently trigger inflections in a company’s performance within say 2 years of joining across multiple companies. I’m genuinely curious.