Hacker News Reader

Comment by miki123211 | Hacker News Reader

Is your printer an IoT device? Is your Echo an IoT device?

I'd say yes to both, and so the problem would persist.

One way to solve this would be to put every single device on a separate vlan (like some public networks do). Just like NAT, that approach certainly has its advantages for the average user from a security perspective, but forces centralization and usage of third-party servers where it shouldn't be required.

Maybe what we need is a "network administration protocol" that would give you pop-ups on your phone when devices tried to discover what's on your network.

View on HN

> Is your printer an IoT device? Is your Echo an IoT device?

>I'd say yes to both, and so the problem would persist.

My IoT LAN is configured to keep each device within the subnet isolated from one another. So while they might share a subnet, they aren't able to snoop on each other. They also do not share the same switch.

Out of curiosity, how do you achieve that? One VLAN per IoT device?

Not OP.

This is done via "L2 Isolation". WiFi access points typically have this setting, as do some wired switches (ex: Cisco's PVLAN)

Managed switch with VLAN, WLAN AP with VLAN. My Ubiquiti networking stuff does this but if you want decent priced 10 gbit managed switch you're SOL. You'll end up with China stuff.

Old Brocade switches are quite feature rich, but still affordable.

I do have Ubiquiti, actually, including two 8x10G SFP+ USW-Aggregation, but AFAIK all devices within a VLAN can still communicate with one another. In an ideal world I'd want them to be completely isolated from one another unless I explicitly set up an ACL allowing access.

Within a VLAN, sure, but that is why you should use separate VLANs. Because when you use the same one, you explicitly say: I want those devices to be able to connect to each other.

I just use two.

One for IoT, guest WiFi, etc.

And one for our server, laptops/PC, and mobile devices.

But ideally I'd fine grain it further.

Right, so one VLAN per group of IoT devices you want to segregate together, e.g. a bunch of security cameras and their NVR would go in one VLAN, a sprinkler controller on a separate VLAN, and so on.

I'm on a single VLAN and associated WLAN for all my IoT devices but I would also like to segregate them further. The 4-WLAN limit on Unifi does limit what can be done, however.

You can do client isolation on the WAP. If you do this, the clients cannot contact each other. Then, on the switch you can assign like 4k VLANs. But I'm not sure how to do that. Because all the data arrives on the same port. But in theory, you have a DHCP server for say a /24 and you could give each of those IPs their own VLAN.

FWIW, I try to use wired as much as possible. Although for security cameras people like to use PoE and I think if you can get physical access to the PoE port, you can also try a MITM or a physical sniffer for examples see the stuff Hak5 sells.

You can enable WiFi isolation in most access points. I've thought about a second AP and lan in my router for this reason. My current AP puts guests on a separate subnet not sure how well isolated though.

Peer to peer isolation is what your missing

What would make more sense, but is harder to do, is to use bridge filtering instead of assigning unique VLANs per device.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com