You can't have things both ways. You have to accept that the cost of seeing content is to see ads. You should have no expectation that you can block ads and see content.
You can't have things both ways. You have to accept that the cost of seeing content is to see ads. You should have no expectation that you can block ads and see content.
The cat-and-mouse game continues...
It’s likely that there are server side checks for a whole tangled mess of client cookies and XHR pings across a hundred different subdomains, and you’re not going to trick them into thinking you’re watching ads when you aren’t.
Trivial.
Cable tv is much nicer. (Although they’re under local jurisdiction which may have something to do with it.)
I wonder if Googles idea of ads is even legal here…
Not into talking heads, if it’s worth saying it’s worth putting it in writing.
I used to use YouTube for music occasionally, now I’m a Spotify subscriber.
Like you can say that is unethical or immoral or whatever, but it is certainly a form of recourse.