Chess: Magnus Carlsen blames opponent's watch for shock defeat
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
1 - pawn
2 - rook
3 - knight
4 - bishop
5 - queen
6 - king
Followed by a pause, followed by another vibration series between 1 - 8 for column, followed by a pause, followed by another 1 - 8 vibration series for row. I don't see how such a device would be feasibly detected. I'm not a radio engineer so I don't know but wouldn't you have to have every chess match played in a Faraday cage to protect against it?
In the past, folks have cheated by having audience plants cough at specific times so that’s a similar amount of potential bandwidth.
After the game Carlsen wrote on X, formerly Twitter: “I was completely crushed in my game today. This is not to accuse my opponent of anything, who played an amazing game and deserved to win, but honestly, as soon as I saw my opponent was wearing a watch early in the game, I lost my ability to concentrate. I obviously take responsibility for my inability to deal with those thoughts properly, but it’s also incredibly frustrating to see organisers still not taking anti-cheating seriously at all (no transmission delay, spectators walking around the playing hall with smartphones).”
That’s like complaining about the refs when you’re being outplayed. It’s sad. Come on Magnus. Don’t do this.
I think therapy is the only way to deal with this type of mental block.
So they might be cheating. Play as best you can. The allegation or even accusation of cheating is such a high bar that rubicon should only be crossed if there’s legit strong evidence. As I recall Hans Neimen was never shown or proven to have cheated in his matches against Carlsen even while he admitted to cheating online in the past.
> However, the joint leaders after two of the 11 rounds were a big surprise: the youngest player Abhimanyu Mishra, 14, and the most controversial, Hans Niemann, 20.