Omnivore – free, open source, read-it-later App
omnivore.app
omnivore.app
So now, it's just a question of when the other shoe drops and they look at monetization. How much will it cost, what will the free version lose, what data of mine will be sold, etc? As long as its good enough and stays true to what appears to be its current vision, I can't see why I wouldn't pay for it, so it's just a matter of trusting that it will stay good over time.
It is open source, so you can run it yourself.
Till the day this becomes possible, I’ll have to use NetNewsWire and Omnivore next to each other. And export and then import articles of interest. This is a PITA.
If you browse to https://omnivore.app/settings/feeds you can add RSS feeds.
Also, after importing most of my feeds I hit the maximum allowed number of feeds. I guess will need to start paying to be able to add more?
Maybe one could use this to circumvent the paid cloud service.
Matter is another paid read-it-later app who's lunch Omnivore is eating, though they seem to be shipping useful features (podcast transcript parsing, send-to-Kindle, etc.) much faster than Readwise.
Tough time to be a for-profit reading app these days, when options like Omnivore exist.
I went with Readwise because they were a bootstrapped company vs VC-funded Matter, but now I'm starting to wish I went with Matter because they've been shipping meaningful updates more reliably.
Also, I interviewer with Dan from Readwise and he totally ghosted me, so I may be a little bitter about that, ha.
I've been using and paying for this: https://mymind.com/
I like it better than any of the many alternatives that I have tried/researched thus far.
Also at €11,99 it’s just too expensive, no matter if it can also dance.
Question: how you all deal with the new reddit app not allowing to share the url of the article / link you end in?
Comparing to other reddit clients we all lost (I was using bacon reader, but it's the same with my hn client) the reddit app inside browser is not providing me the possibility to share the page I am visiting (normally the three dots in the top right corner)
How did you solve this problem?
See setSelfHostingDetails
https://github.com/omnivore-app/omnivore/blob/a20b956e26dc98...
FWIW, I use both services daily and maintain a plugin to import Raindrop annotations & highlights into Logseq. I enjoy using Omnivore for reading much more than Raindrop.
Thank you!
https://github.com/omnivore-app/omnivore/issues/25
My guess is it started as an app first and self-hosting was an afterthought.
It would be interesting to see how other node projects shim in support for other clouds (including locally hosted services in the docker image).
I’ve been using Pocket less and less these days because I’m concerned about lock-in (both in terms of my data and the business model).
It’s a shame that Mozilla hasn’t managed to open-source Pocket in all these years. People that care about (and are capable of) self-hosting would probably gladly donate/contribute; people caring about the convenience paired with the brand name could just continue paying for the SaaS version.
But one feature that I will like on Pocket, and an AI feature that I think will be actually useful and not just hype, is segment my articles (readed/to be read) by broad categories. I don't have time to manually add categories. This tool have something like that?
Instapaper has been in maintenance mode for years, yet it has workable pagination, and none of the competitors do.
It works well - now I'm just looking for a good way to annotate/highlight the local HTML/PDF/ePUB files cross-OS cross-platform. KOReader (https://github.com/koreader/koreader) works pretty well for this with its new hash-based storage option.
It has the added advantage that the file format is just plain HTML, and together with “reader mode” in most browsers, it’s a great way to save long-form text or other mostly static pages for later reference.
It obviously doesn’t work for very dynamic pages, let alone web apps.
0. https://github.com/harvard-lil/scoop
2. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/save-page-we/
3. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/save-page-we/dhhpe...
[0]: https://www.theverge.com/23915813/sequel-sofa-media-tracking...
I still think there are some pros of the mono repo, but definitely some cons as well. Especially for people trying to work on just a small bit of the code.
429 Too many requests