Neither of which run LLaVA as far as I can tell. Use this until that happens.
Also, this is way easier to set up. No dependencies. Easy.
why not? both uses llamacpp as backend
llama.cpp does not have interactive mode support for LLaVA nor the web server yet. So if they're just invoking the app, there is a lot of overhead for each call until they add that in. This server doesn't have that issue.