Hacker News Reader

I think what the author means is, that online/digital voting is more insecure than paper voting.

I don't think that is a biased take. An attack on paper voting is always going to be more complex thus making it more secure.

You just invented a moderate position that explicitly did not exist in the article.

>I don't think that is a biased take. An attack on paper voting is always going to be more complex thus making it more secure.

Until some genius figure teleportation, then cats are out of the bag ;-)

Anyone knows if Star Trek figured that one?