This article is gibberish and reads like the drug-addled ravings of someone who has no knowledge of web design. I don't even know where to START.

The author seems to have no idea what a CMS is, what a Javascript framework is, or what Bootstrap is. He's sort of trying to compare a blog engine to a blog template, which is kind of like answering the age old question: What's better: a house or wall?

We get insane gems like:

  The basic design of the blogging CMS has in fact always
  been deficient. This means putting the site content in a
  database, then generate a page from a SQL query. Then as
  we realize that it's too slow to display, a cache is used
  that creates for each page a HTML file locally.

That's not really true, and Wordpress has drop-in plugins which handle all that for you anyhow. And we don't get anything about how a Javascript framework might work; needless to say they are all database backed. Then we see:

  Why put the contents into a database and then copy it to
  a file on the local system, rather than store it directly
  in an HTML container?

Apparently he's advocating for static file generators like Jekyll? That...almost makes sense. Not that he names any such apps or frameworks, or gives any discussion why they're useful, and he apparently thinks they somehow are jQuery based...?!

What a trainwreck. The only purpose seems to be to try and drive page rank to www.xaml.fr which doesn't look like a real site to me. I think this is just some sort of blogspam/linkbait/SEO trick.