Instead, I propose that he's been breathing different oxygen for so long that he's long since started believing his own legend. Frankly, I just don't believe that he has anyone in his life who would serve as a grounding influence, and I find this really sad.
Anyhow, I jumped into the thread because I find calling someone demonstrably brilliant an "uneducated, delusional moron" might feel good but it distracts from the real discussion.
I can believe that pmarca is wrong about many things, but that doesn't make him a moron. pmarca is clearly not a moron. If you have a huge problem with his opinions, writing him off as a moron is intellectually lazy and it won't advance your position.
In other words, we were both replying to a comment that did indeed call him a moron.
As the other poster said it's not relevant how smart someone is in one arena because they can have dogshit opinions in others.
https://www.chess.com/blog/Rodgy/the-genius-craze-of-bobby-f...
I for one would have loved some more substance to your post...
I would stand up to defend your right to read and enjoy a good book by a person that you aren't an expert in.
In general, I try to start by extending the benefit of doubt. It seems like nobody here stopped to wonder if pmarca had any idea that the dude wrote the Fascist Manifesto. And if he didn't, does he still deserve to be shamed for enjoying his other work without Googling him first?
What if you found out the author of the last thing you read was a fascist after the fact? Should we be mad at you?
Do you Google the author of everything you read? If so, that sounds exhausting.
https://owl.excelsior.edu/argument-and-critical-thinking/log...