We really should rename the link. It is grossly misleading.
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
Amazon (check) let (check) its drivers' urine (check) be sold (check) as energy drinks (check).
Yes, equivocating over the meaning of "let", the headline is technically true. Like so, so many other technically true but misleading headlines.
They choose not to implement sufficient checks. They bear some responsibility for what's being sold under their name on their website.
Can you think of any other retailer where this is or could be happening? Could you imagine Walmart selling cocaine? Yet somehow it's ok if Amazon does it because "we stopped after we discovered what we were doing was illegal"?