Are most published research findings false?

Whether or not the statistical methods used in psychology can be finessed to show a majority are statistically significant, the foundational paradigms are so weak it doesn't even matter.

"If you deleted a whole bunch of papers from across the literature, though, that would really make a difference, and we’d have to rebuild big parts of the field from the ground up. Right?

No, not really. We did delete those papers, and nothing much happened. In 2015, a big team of researchers tried to redo 100 psychology studies, and about 60% failed to replicate.

This finding made big waves and headlines, and it's already been cited nearly 8,000 times.

But the next time someone brings it up, ask them to name as many of the 100 studies as they can. My bet is they top out at zero. I'm basically at zero myself, and I've written about that study at length. (I asked a few of my colleagues in case I'm just uniquely stupid, and their answers were: 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, and 3.)" https://www.experimental-history.com/p/im-so-sorry-for-psych...