Why doesn’t the CGI wikipedia page [0] include mentions / references to this debacle? And the related cost overruns?
That page is unsurprisingly manicured and free of any “controversies” section.
That page is unsurprisingly manicured and free of any “controversies” section.
""" There's lots more at the wikipedia article on healthcare.gov, in particular CGI's poor performance on a Massachusetts state website, which at least one report "characterized as a complete failure... The software created by CGI was of poor quality and unusable" (that from the wikipedia article) That may or may not be true, but it should at least be mentioned here. Instead we have (as you say) what appears to be an advertisement from CGI's PR department--still, years later. Mcswell (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC) """