Mozilla's first-ever Annual Consumer Creep-O-Meter
foundation.mozilla.org
foundation.mozilla.org
I appreciate that the user can skip to result's with giving Mozilla an email address. I generally like Firefox and Thunderbird, using those more than any other similar, but increasingly Moz://a feels a bit pushy-creepy. Less than many others, but still.
>Asks for email address to sign up for a mailing list
Ironic.
I have an android phone, google account and probably 300 other accounts in my password manager, all of which suck up my data.
According to this tool I'm living "off-the-grid". What a farce.
As a full time Firefox user, this continues to be incredibly disappointing.
Yeah, no. Mozilla deserves A LOT of criticism but this definitely isn't one of them.
Settings -> Google -> Manage your Google account-> Data and Privacy
Just disable anything you don't use.
You can also have an android phone without registering a Google account.
No idea how to disable activation lock without a reset either.
The consumer outreach part of this was a good idea from mozilla (the quiz on the other hand was a terrible idea) but this really should have been handled with more care.
Otherwise just pack, go join some NGO and help making the world a better place instead.
cyberpunk vibes
Signal started collecting names, phone numbers, photos, and most importantly contacts and is now keeping that data in the cloud, but they refuse to update their privacy policy to detail that. Mozilla thinks that Signal only collects your phone number, and optionally your name and photo but that simply isn't true. If you include your name and photo in your profile Signal collects that data without asking and there is no way to stop them from collecting your contacts.
Mozilla also claims that the data Signal collects can't be seen by anyone but that's a very open question considering how they're storing the data (SGX) and how it's protected (a simple PIN). See: https://community.signalusers.org/t/proper-secure-value-secu...
Most telling to me though is how Signal communicated the change to collecting this data (which was extremely evasive and resulted in a lot of confusion and misunderstandings) and their refusal to update their privacy policy - the very first line of which reads: "Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information.", but if I were a whistleblower or a human right's activist I'd absolutely consider a list of everyone I was contacting using Signal to be "sensitive information" and Signal is designed to collect that data and keep it forever in the cloud.
Signal promotes their app to the types of people whose freedom and lives depend on their communications being secure so I think lying to those same people about Signal's data collection practices is sickening, but I suspect that doing it so obviously may also be the folks behind Signal doing everything they can to warn people away. That would also explain some of Signal's other recent questionable actions like adding weird crypto stuff and removing one of their most popular features: the ability to use the app for both secure communication and unsecured SMS/MMS.
I'm sure that Mozilla means well with this project, but I guess this is just a reminder to do your own homework and not take people's recommendations at face value, especially when you're dealing with highly sensitive data.
* WeChat => You’re an open book.
* WeChat & Telegram => You’re off the grid.
A privacy quiz which gives nonsensical, misleading, and incomplete results is obviously not a good thing.
It's best just to name and shame companies collecting far more data than they need (like cars with microphones that listen in on your conversations/lovemaking, or roku devices that upload multiple screenshots per second of whatever is being displayed), because that at least educates consumers of the risks. Consumers can't complain and demand changes if they don't even know about the abuses that are happening and nobody selling consumers these devices is going to say anything.