> scientific evaluation shows that it's like: writes a program 80% of the time, the program compiles 20% of the time, the program works 5% of the time.
Can you share the source for this?
Can you share the source for this?
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.04477.pdf
The results of this kind of eval could be across the board, you could pick out a set of examples worse than what I said (Games, C++) or pick one out that is really good (Algorithms, Ruby)
There was this one also
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12357
which showed some pitfalls…. In some case the LLM could say which project the source code was from which meant it had seen it in the training data and the code ought not to be in the test data.