Hacker News Reader

Comment by mattgrice | Hacker News Reader

change has only ever been bad for GA. GA is now just a really expensive sport for old people who bought their planes 40 years ago when Beechcraft ran ads in National Geographic. Of course they are going to be resistant to change, and possibly rightfully so because GA is 1 or 2 steps away from being completely dead.

View on HN

As one of those grumpy old pilots, I can understand it. Change (especially regulatory change) in GA usually translates into one of the following: 1. Making this very expensive hobby even more expensive, 2. Making this inaccessible hobby less accessible, 3. Moving more from the hobbyists to commercial interests (airliners).

There have been great exceptions (Medical reform + BasicMED, small recent changes around experimental/amateur-built category, and the upcoming MOSAIC reform), but I think the old fogies have a point about the damage change tends to bring to this activity.

This is fine though. Much as I loved when my grandpa would fly me around in his cessna, and taking flying lessons myself, there's no "right" to a GA hobby, or any hobby with huge externalities. Some things belong in the past.

No sympathy. Where I live, there are strong noise restrictions on holidays and Sundays. A huge proportion of the population support this - it is very nice to have days without lawnmowers, chainsaws or whatever.

Who is exempt? Aviation. One plane makes noise over tens of thousands of people. The absolute worst are the stunt planes.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com