Hacker News Reader

Comment by eterevsky | Hacker News Reader

The article suggests that this land is owned by a public organization.

But still. It's a ground of someone and that someone doesn't want photos to be taken - so, I have to accept that.

One shouldn't get angry just because it's not allowed. Instead, one should search for reasons why like that and not the other way around.

> I have to accept that.

This is very much what the opaque private companies gobbling up land and services and slapping contract law all over it want you to think.

Yes. But that's the law. The law can be changed. There just needs to be a supportive majority for that. Them(TM) opaque private companies also have to obey the same laws as me and me as whatever can force them to accept certain things. Even though Them don't want it.

They're just excel their granted rights. Sometimes more than that. Then, sometimes get fined or worse. I also can do my right flipping and creative money laundering as well. I have more to lose, I guess, is the reason I don't.

But I'm pretty aware of my rights :)

So I have to accept that and insist on that this has to be accepted haha

Navy boats are owned by a public organization, but I don't get to borrow them for a weekend in Ibiza.

The Navy doesn't extract profits from public areas the government tossed to them, cannibalizing and selling off the commonwealth to private interests.

Navy boats are not typically open to the public.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com