His entire point is that this "doesn't happen". The VERY first commenter points out many instances where it does happen and the author makes up reasons for why those aren't relevant.

This feels like someone wanted to make an argument and instead of collecting supporting evidence, just made some stuff up and then got sour when someone proved them wrong. He also used "mute point" instead of "moot point", which, while I never wanna be the grammar nazi, is pretty lol. Why do articles like this get upvotes?