Show HN: An AI courthouse to resolve arguments with your friends | Hacker News Reader

Show HN: An AI courthouse to resolve arguments with your friends

funcannyai.com

8 pointszaneil23 comments

An AI judge will rule on your dispute between friends, roommates, or lovers (ok, maybe not lovers).

This is neat. Little bit of feedback:

1. Since an account is required, consider adding example output from each step. This could be on a different page other than the homepage titled maybe "Sample cases." Before creating an account, I'd like to know what sort of results I can expect.

2. Lighten the opacity of steps that cannot be accessed yet. For example, if I'm on "Submit Dispute," I'm currently able to click "Judge's Thoughts" and the accordion button changes as if it's expanded. It took me a second to realize I needed to complete the current step before I'm able to move forward.

3. There are some "interesting" looking keys (PK, SK) in your `DidactApi.js` file. You might have a look and consider moving those outside of your build if they're still active.

Thanks for your thoughtful feedback! I'll implement 1 and 2 by end of week. For #3 those aren't active or useful even if they were active. But I can clean it up anyway (pardon my mess).

Very cool idea, though I just want to mention that in the signup form the TOS and privacy policy links almost have the same color as the background, and also the dark green in the login form clashes with the blue.

Might give it a shot some time, I know some people who would find it fun.

I appreciate for the attention to detail and design! Ill fix those in my next release.

Let me know what you think :)

Haha, i love it! The judge didnt decide my dispute, but it was absolutely correct nonetheless!

Thanks! Yes, I have seen that it doesn't always rule in favor of one party, but generally its a situation when you wouldnt really want it rule in favor of one party or another.

Do you feel comfortable sharing the prompt or conflict?

yeah, good call. I'll put the login upfront. thanks!

fixed this so login required before user types anything. Still requires a login though.

Good dev

very legal & very cool!

THanks! Disclaimer: the Ai Judge is here for fun, not serious legal matters. Haha.

You know what I mean :/)

What do you think about r/KarmaCourt on Reddit? Not that I wanna pump Reddit but I would concede that I love the whole concept of KarmaCourt. Its always hilarious and I'm sure its legit helped solve a real bona fide conflict or issue.

Families should have trials to help work through stuff and learn how to make it fun solving conflicts and getting to be judges and counsel etc. How many kids would turn down the opportunity to be judge and prosecutor but where everyone holds everyone to account in a loving but assertive way that requires everyone to play by the rules and really get a more concrete understanding of what needs work

Like on Sunny in Philadelphia over the Spilled-Cereal-at-the-wheel Trial

I just checked out Karmacourt, very cool. Ill look for inspiration there.

Speaking of that, my sister and I did a mock trial when we were in elementary school when we were fighting over a pair of broken sunglasses. The trial ended in both of us crying.

Love that episode!

Sympathy denied but leave to appeal for empathy granted. Click click ;)

I think the potential for using AI to kinda help meld therapy and conflict resolution/law is an important innovation that is pending.

I think the trust/openness necessary for therapy is a challenge to meld it with the law. For example, people won't admit fault if there are legal repercussions. That being said, Judges and lawyers with more empathy would be great which what I tried to add to the "Judges Thoughts" section. 100% agree with therapy and conflict resolution.

r/SubredditSimulator is hilarious too but I can't say how "dialectical" it truly is as opposed to be more stochastic in the sense or logic department(s)