Why the downvotes? If you want real security, self-host your Git repo.
> just the name of repo could be sensitive info
The phrase "sensitive info" tells me disclosing it to a mass code hoster bare any liability deems irresponsible. Remember Eric Schmidt about privacy on the internet?
Choose your priorities.
Why is “security” always a pissing constant with some people. I’d swear that I’d be condemned for locking my house at night instead of simply encasing myself in concrete for all eternity like Chernobyl. After all, it’s more secure!