Guy went from junior to senior dev in 1.5 years, BS or not?
peoplewhocode.io
peoplewhocode.io
I always wondered if that was also strong reason for 2 years career jumps in software
This usually takes about 5 to 7 years, in my experience. After about that much time working in a focused way on software you're probably pretty "senior" at dev work, without a whole lot more to learn in terms of just getting better at coding.
The author doesn't quite fit that description. This sounds more like what happens at lots of high turnover "fast paced" startups. As people come and go from the group they find themselves in a situation where their 1 or more years of experience is allowing them to significantly outperform those with 0 to 6 months of experience. Maybe high turnover or rapid growth at the employer makes it easy to get promoted to "senior" because there are so many other truly very junior people around.
Not to belittle the author at all. Sounds like a smart guy and I admire his enthusiasm and spirit. Just sounds like crazy-startup-battlefield-promotion "senior" rather than the more rigorous definition of senior some of us might be thinking about.
I have been dealing with computers since August 2000 and have never called myself "senior", even though at various interviews I went through for potential hiring, the HR and / or their managers, even one CEO said my qualifications aligned with those of a very experienced senior developer or software engineering which left me both speechless and baffling...me, senior? No way...
The reason is simple: I went for junior positions because the only web development professional experience I have is a 2-year web developer dealing with SEO stuff back in 2006 until 2008.
Now on a personal level, that's another story; I have done multiple NDA-ed projects which I could not share with them, unfortunately :/
The main "excuse" I went for junior positions is so I can enter the market and acquire what tech stack and tools companies use, in contrast to what I personally use to deliver a project.
Feel free to believe whatever you like, no worries.
"Okay, I don't feel like a $whatever. What knowledge, skills, or abilities would I need to have to to be considered that thing?"
If you can't answer, then maybe you are the $whatever role here.
or maybe
"Would I consider someone else with my experience, skillset, and abilities to be $whatever?"
I haven’t seen his work of course but it seems totally possible from this view.
Everything just clicked for this guy. He wrote solid, high-quality code and could take on basically any problem as a junior. Rose very, very quickly.
As for the guy in the article: think about any junior you've ever worked with and the kind of work they're assigned. It's usually not high-impact, deep/broad, technical stuff. Hell, even non-juniors need a good few months to come up to speed in a codebase, not to mention some domains require a good bit of seat time to hit your stride as a dev. So, under 12 months of that basic junior-style work and then you're a "senior"? Not convinced
https://boards.greenhouse.io/bobsledinc/jobs/4098494005?gh_j...
The job pays between 130-160k. He's probably on the low end of that. So he gets to make an article saying he makes 6 figures. Outside the tech world, that catches everyone's attention. All that matters is pay. Would he be senior at a company that pays actual Sr level salaries? Probably not. I made more then that as a Jr level employee at a tech company.