Hacker News Reader

Pre-Wikipedia encyclopedias could be worse! And their inaccuracies could last a long time since not everyone could afford or wanted to update their entire set. You also had no way to see the discussion behind claims to help inform your interpretation.

Wikipedia seeks reliable sources. If you dispute a source, take it up in the article's talk page.

Nah, I'll let sleeping dogs lie. Beyond done trying to give all my time to help out forums and social media stuck in their ways.

And yet Wikipedia has ended up being more accurate than "Encyclopedia Britannica which was curated by experts".

How odd.