The only concrete example that page gives is from Suella Braverman, who has just been fired for incompetence/general weirdness, and that's a difficult one in the modern Tory Party, let me tell you. I am... unconvinced this is a thing.
> This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. (October 2023)
I suspect I may be part of Dr. Henderson's "elite", but since I follow[0] these idealistic viewpoints as well as promoting them, and in order to avoid the Lie Direct and stick with the Retort Courteous[1]: having read the fine article my opinion is otherwise.
[0] to the point of having voted with my feet to live in a better society than the States had, and (to judge from the news) has.
[1] see As You Like It V:iv
(households) I support a society where —as in the US of the last century in which I grew up— a single working parent suffices to support a household.
(religion) I support a society which has its own intrinsic solidarity, without needing the sort of middlemen who "love to pray standing ... in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men."
(success) I support a society where a good education —in trades as well as professions— is available even to those who have been so unwise as to pick the wrong parents.
(racism) I support a society where, sure, there's always some ethnicity on the bottom rungs, but at least it changes every generation as the old bottom rungs assimilate. (Over the last half century it's been, in turn, italians, turks, former yugoslavs, former warsaw pact, and now I guess north africans?)
Fortunately we don't have "high crime neighbourhoods" in the US sense — I think there are several obvious reasons why not, but implementing them in the US would require not only structural changes, but probably also constitutional amendment. (having seen what happened to the ERA in the Old Country, I'm not holding my breath)
Read the article if you don't like the wiki page.
Braverman got fired for being right. Sunak is weak.