Software is solving much more difficult problems than ever before thanks to this evolution to higher abstractions.
Case in point: I once had a co-worker show me a Java crash report from a crash that nobody could figure out. Every now and again, the server, Tomcat, JVM and all, would just die, spitting out a stack trace that went into native land.
One really nice thing on the crash report was a full register dump, stack address dump, and a dump of the memory around the PC. So I disassembled the memory, figured out that it was calling memcpy when it died, and lo-and-behold, one of the register operands was 0! A comparison of the stack addresses showed that it was dying in a library used for biometric fingerprint based authentication.
The vendor kept insisting that the problem was on our side (we had a JNI library of our own that called their library, but I desk checked it twice and concluded that it was fine), so I disassembled the whole library and traced what it was doing. It turns out that certain kinds of incomplete fingerprint scans wouldn't trigger a rejection at the high level, but would cause a rejection at the lower levels (almost... it would clear the pointer to the data but would then return TRUE instead of FALSE). The library would then carry on its merry way passing a null pointer lower and lower until it died in memcpy, taking the JVM with it.
Please prove that. :-)
Most of what I see is reskinned GUIs from the early 80s... first on Mac OS, then on Windows, then on OSX, then on Linux, then on the Web, then on handsets...
more pixels per inch != more essentially complex.
big data was being handled by bank mainframes in the 1970s (the original cloud computing. :o).
The list goes on and on and on. I can't imagine how anyone could seriously argue that we're not leagues ahead of where we were in the 70s.
I used to play Elite too and, while it had some unique qualities, it wouldn't compete with any of the better modern titles for my attention now.