>Additionally, the training loop (which you call 'dumb') is just...a teacher-forced version of inference, which you call 'smart'?
What powers In context learning is not very well understood but it doesn't appear to be or really work exactly like just a non teacher-forced version of training. There are qualitative differences. The same models have no problem with this 'curse' when the information is provided in context for example.
>It's better to simply minimize the log-likelihood in a scalable way. Hand-engineered solutions rarely survive compared to strong-scaling ones.
I never said anything about it being bad.