This is exactly the intent of a MIT license. The only unfair aspect is that they seem to have removed the original license notice, which is a requirement.
Their project is MIT licensed too, so if you like what they’re doing you can play your Uno reverse card!
What I'm exposing here is an attempt at making people believe he is the author of said code. Not someone who took 90% of a project and is building something with it, but that he wrote the entirety of the code.
In the scrollbars on the right, blue is modified, green is new, black is equal. Only a handful of hooks, helpers and simple components are still the same. 90% sounds quite far from reality.
Not that I think the lack of credit given to the original project isn’t scummy, but… it’s just someone being an asshole, not much you can do about that.
Basically doing stuff like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/developersIndia/comments/14m3evc/i_...
The video is him basically showing our CMS with the logos swapped.
Our project includes near 100% test coverage, and enterprise features that any serious development shop will require.
ISO27000/27001 compliance is a big start in non trivial changes.