It's a play to warm the public up to the idea of a more algorithmically managed organization. In Act I, the board jesters stumble around making bad decisions and wavering. In Act II, the embarrassed board welcomes the first AI oversight into the company constitution. ...
Act III, more paper clips
This is certainly making a case for the fallibility of human leadership.
When are they putting GPT on the board?
Well, it sounds like they took advice from GPT in their execution of the coup.
Just as software devs are allergic to voting machines which run software, I would imagine that ML companies will be the last to adopt ML for their own high-level decision making.
and for good reasons!
Absolutely. Who else is in a better position to understand the true limitations of these complex and failure-prone systems?