Seems like a pretty crazy claim, want to share your reasoning?
No ideology = no characteristic thinking.
If you think you don't have ideology, you probably have the dominant one. Or don't think.
Just because A -> B, and we have B, doesn't mean we can conclude A.
Sure,
Idealogy -> a manner of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture
But A manner of thinking characteristic of an individual -> idealogy
Doesn't follow from that!Like, the "definition" of car is 'a vehicle moving on wheels', but we can't from that conclude that all vehicles moving on wheels are cars.
For instance, from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ideology, "the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual (...)"