Calcium is, but maybe because it's not processed as most metals it is not included in the graph
For context, as of 2019, we produced enough of this "brine" to cover Florida with 30 centimeters of brine every year. That means, as a whole, desalination plants actually produce even more toxic wastewater than they do clean drinking water.
As a result figuring out ways we could utilize this _product_ ("byproduct" feels like the wrong term here considering it's the primary thing produced) is a major area of interest
Can you cite your claim?
> Furthermore, chemicals such as biocides, surface−active agents, anti-scale additives, and solid residues from filter backflushing may be present in the effluent discharge on a continuous or periodic basis, posing a risk to the environment
> Brine effluents from RO desalination plants not only have a high salt content but typically also contain compounds from the desalination process, such as phosphonate-based antiscalants and ferric (or alum) sulphate-based coagulants
[1] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.8451...
[2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00431...
> However, concern also exists regarding the use and release of toxic anti-foulants and anti-scalants to maintain plant infrastructure
[3] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00431...
> The super-salty substance is made even more toxic by the chemicals used in the desalination process, researchers reported in the journal Science of the Total Environment.
> Copper and chlorine, for example, are both commonly used.
[4] https://phys.org/news/2019-01-brine-highlights-toxic-problem...
Go from the super high salinity brine through to crude salt, then chloralkali process to get sodium (which can be cleaned up) and chlorine gas (industrially useful).
Mined salt is probably more valuable as table salt (and cattle feed) than as source of metallic Na