AFAIK there is still some limit before the company is treated like a public one from various legal perspectives. Something like "no more than 2000 private investors"?
Given that there are probably over a million qualified investors in the US alone, that is just a very small fraction of those.
If you don't trust ChatGPT to make investments, you shouldn't trust the masses (including me) either.
It is unfortunate that the laws also forbid many sound investments, but not as large a problem as you might think because most of the real oppertunities would never have been offered to random people anyway.
But it's probably best they stay private. As you can see in these HN comments, public investors lack the ability to see the project through. i.e. there will be failures, planned and unplanned.
This is also why I think Kickstarter projects should be restricted to people who understand that they can end up with nothing.
I know of at least a couple low-profile high-value things that are invite-only and I'm only a part of because I'm in the network. This is probably the future of these things. Being able to constrain your audience to only somewhat wealthy people insulates you from the lumpenproletariat, perhaps at the cost of some smart and unwealthy.
And to be honest, the lumpenproles usually demand to be protected from these things, so it's a good idea to give them that since there's an easy way to segment the population.
https://www.sec.gov/education/smallbusiness/exemptofferings/...