*Freedom of movement* doesn't require that you are able to drive your own car. It's not *new* either. Get pulled over for a DUI, and you won't be allowed to drive for a while.
There is a world of difference between that and not being able to operate the vehicle you own on private or public areas after a computer receives a command.
Which is not a feature described by the bill or claimed in the above article.
If the AI or whatever determines that you are impaired is offloaded to the cloud, then it can send a stop command remotely, and will almost certainly be abused by malicious actors (and some governments). If it is onboard, then it is still likely going to be a closed source software or hardware module that can send a stop command to the car.
In any case it creates a mechanism within cars for disabling it outside the control of the owner or operator