Do you mean that artificial neurons are inherently passive while biological neurons are inherently active i.e. they would act in spite of external input?
Just wondering if I understood you, I don't know anything on the subject.
Just wondering if I understood you, I don't know anything on the subject.
- a fully deterministic machine (even if the interface and the way OpenAI let people access ChatGPT make it seem like it's non-deterministic, there are fully deterministic models out there, who not only only respond to inputs but also always respond the exact same thing given the same inputs [query, seed, ...]),
and:
- god exists
There could be chaos at work when human thinks. There may be interferences at play, say because whatever element that traveled trillion of kilometers just traversed our brain.
While a fully deterministic machine that always respond to the same input in the same way is just that: a deterministic machine.
P.S: I don't know about other LLMs like Falcon 180b but image-generation models like StableDiffusion are fully deterministic. I think a model is using a broken design and shall quickly hit limitations if it cannot be queried in a deterministic way (and its usecases are certainly limited if repeatability is not achievable). If you want different answers, use a different seed or a different query. But the same query+seed should always give the exact same output.
Are these different ideas of God entirely? Yes: in India there are however many gods and Brahman says these are lesser precisely because they don’t include the whole universe.