I disagree with a lot of points made here. First, this is focused exclusively on the biological sciences, and is largely not applicable to other fields (hence the title is misleading). Second, there are a lot of personal anecdotes which don't move the central ideas forward. Finally, there was little in the article that discussed how to think about science, most of it was how to pursue science.

That being said, I agree with the sentiment. Most of what we teach undergraduates is about the knowledge science is produced, rather than about the process of doing science itself.