[0]: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/issues/4216#issuecomm...
Whether it's any good is another matter, I guess the leaderboard on HuggingFace will be updated at some point.
I was also hoping for that, but my initial research suggests that you need to fit everything into VRAM (or RAM when doing llama.cpp CPU inference).
The upside is that it should be as fast as running a single 7B model, which on llama.cpp should be in the ballpark of 10 tok/sec when 4-bit quantized.
For local usage, I'd say you will have an "OK" experience in a recent laptop with 64GB RAM, which is more realistic than having the necessary VRAM in a Nvidia GPU.
"Concretely, Mixtral has 45B total parameters but only uses 12B parameters per token. It, therefore, processes input and generates output at the same speed and for the same cost as a 12B model."