> I can't point to anything specifically incorrect about this reporting.
Then your comment is a genetic fallacy. You're highlighting a potential motive or potential for bias, but without anything substantive to say.
Then your comment is a genetic fallacy. You're highlighting a potential motive or potential for bias, but without anything substantive to say.
This is only the "genetic fallacy" if you assume that the trustworthiness of Al Jazeera articles is uncorrelated. My entire argument is that this publication is systematically not impartial, and wants to convince you of a particular (Pro-Palestinian) position.