Not meaningfully. If a kid wants to find porn, they'll find porn. These sorts of measures are ultimately ineffective at blocking everything, and if there's even one thing that slips through, even if only for a little while, that's enough.
Isn’t this bill supposed to “protect children”? Accessing porn isn’t illegal for adults. If the debate is about restricting access to a legal “vice” then opinions will likely shift even farther to the “no” side. I agree imposing puritanical beliefs is the actual motivation but that’s not a great slogan.
Yes.
>Accessing porn isn’t illegal for adults.
Correct. Porn isn't illegal for adults now, nor will it be illegal if the bill becomes law.
>If the debate is about restricting access to a legal “vice”
It isn't.
>I agree imposing puritanical beliefs is the actual motivation
I don't agree.
You're blowing a single word out of proportion.