The article exposes in my opinion one of the great weaknesses of the way Swedish society works.

Generally Swedish society is very conflict averse and decisions are made trying to achieve consensus (or at least to give the impression they do), everyone's voice has to be heard and nobody wants to appear to actually force decisions.

This leads to a process that is slow when decisive action is required and particularly in light of bullying allegations ignores the impact of having the situation continue for a long time in order to appear fair.

I had a colleague experience a similar situation when his child was being severely bullied at school. Everyone was occupied with assessing the impact of a decision on the bullies and avoided making an decision, without considering the impact of dragging their feet on the bullied child